💊 Decision Path: The Empty Clinic and Funding Cuts

The scenario begins with Decision 1: Clinic Stock-Outs. You arrive at your rural clinic only to find that all HIV and TB drugs are gone due to international funding cuts, and a waiting room full of desperate patients. Your primary choice is between turning patients away (risking treatment interruptions), referring them to a distant hospital (most can't afford transport), or rationing the remaining stock with partial doses (unsafe medical practice).

​

Branching Paths from Resource Depletion 📉

• Path 2A: Turn Patients Away. If you choose to Turn patients away until next month, you risk treatment interruptions and drug resistance. At Decision 2A, your options are to explain the funding cuts and ask for patience (leading to patient loss of trust), refer them to another NGO facility (some get help, others are refused), or give them no alternative (patients stop showing up altogether).

  • Leading to 3A: If patients lose trust (Decision 3A), you must call a community meeting (growing awareness but rising anger), stay quiet (allowing rumors and misinformation to spread), or leave the clinic temporarily (making patients feel abandoned). The community anger that arises at Decision 4A then forces a choice: advocating openly against funding cuts (risking your job but raising awareness), defending yourself and blaming the donors (risking further withdrawal of donor support), or staying diplomatic (allowing tensions to simmer without resolution). Advocating openly leads to Decision 5A: Risk Your Job, where you must decide whether to continue speaking out (losing your job but sparking global attention), stopping after a warning (keeping your job but staying silent), or leaking information anonymously (community suspects, but you stay safe).

​

• Path 2B: Distant Hospital Referral. If you Send them to a distant hospital, most patients cannot afford transport. When a patient needs help at Decision 2B, you must choose between giving her money from your own pocket (unsustainable sacrifice), telling her to borrow from family (creating community tension), or asking her to wait until the next month's supply arrives (her health declines).

  • Leading to 3D: If you choose Personal Sacrifice (Decision 3D), you face burnout and poverty. Your choices are to keep sacrificing (leading to burnout and poverty for you), setting limits and stopping payment (patients feel abandoned again), or asking wealthier community members to contribute (creating inequality in access). The consequences of personal sacrifice lead to Decision 4J: Burnout and Poverty, forcing you to consider quitting immediately (clinic collapses), taking unpaid leave to recover (patients unsupported, but you regain strength), or continuing to push despite exhaustion (collapse looms). If you quit, Decision 5J: Clinic Collapses forces a grim set of outcomes: patients scatter to far-off facilities (many die), community volunteers step up (makeshift solutions emerge), or the government sends replacements (slow arrival of new staff).

​

• Path 2C: Rationing Drugs. Choosing to Ration remaining stock by giving partial doses offers immediate relief but is medically unsafe. At Decision 2C, you must choose between continuing rationing quietly (patients get weaker, resistance grows), telling patients openly about rationing (they feel betrayed but understand the shortage), or stopping rationing due to the risks (supplies run out completely).

  • Leading to 3G: Quiet rationing results in Decision 3G: Drug Resistance Grows. You must admit the mistake and stop (patients are angry but cooperative), continue rationing (resistance spreads further), or try herbal/traditional remedies (some patients worsen quickly). Admitting the mistake leads to Decision 4S: Admitting Mistakes, where you can form a patient advocacy group (collective power grows), promise improvement soon (raising false hope), or tell them nothing more can be done (total despair sets in). Forming a patient advocacy group leads to Decision 5M: Patient Advocacy, where the group considers joining a protest in the capital (visibility but danger), supporting the protest quietly (safer, less impact), or discouraging protest altogether (silence and inaction).

​

The Final Outcomes 🤝

The ultimate paths branch from the Decision 5 points:

• 6A, 6B, 6C: Focus on the outcome of Risking Your Job (losing job for global attention vs. staying silent vs. anonymous leaking).

• 6D, 6E, 6F: Focus on the outcome of Hostility and accusations (respected but resented vs. power vacuum vs. external intervention).

• 6G, 6H, 6I: Focus on the outcome of Bureaucratic Delays (small funding restored vs. local unity vs. crisis worsens).

• 6J, 6K, 6L: Focus on the outcome of Clinic Collapse (patients dying vs. makeshift solutions vs. slow staff replacement).

• 6M, 6N, 6O: Focus on the outcome of Patient Advocacy (protesting in the capital vs. quiet support vs. silence and inaction).